From: To: Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1 Date: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:01 PM Send KRnet mailing list submissions to krnet@mylist.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to krnet-request@mylist.net You can reach the person managing the list at krnet-owner@mylist.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: cowling (mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com) 2. RE: cowling (Ron Eason) 3. RE: cowling (Ron Eason) 4. RE: cowling (Ron Eason) 5. Re: cowling (Brian Kraut) 6. Cowling (JIM VANCE) 7. Re: Cowling (Dan Heath) 8. New airfoil (Colin) 9. Roll Call 10. Re: RED OAK - GATHERING (William Clapp) 11. Tach (William Clapp) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:34:23 -0400 From: "mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com" To: "KR builders and pilots" Subject: RE: KR>cowling Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20030827115845.00b69e28@pop-server.socal.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 1 Larry, The best thing to resolve your issue is to put some two part pour in place foam on the edges and let it "weld" the blocks together. This way you end up with a continuous foam core without gaps or hard glue joints. It works out great because you don't need to be too careful about fit of the blocks because the foam will expand to fill up any gaps. Regards, Bob Lee ______________________________ N52BL KR2 Suwanee, GA 30024 91% done only 51% to go! Phone/Fax: 770/844-7501 mailto:bob@flyboybob.com http://flyboybob.com -----Original Message----- From: krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net]On Behalf Of larry severson Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:01 PM To: KR builders and pilots Subject: KR>cowling >I am starting on the cowling. Contouring with blocks of foam makes sense, >but how does one join the blocks? Everything that I have tried either has >insufficient holding power, or is too hard to sand, leaving ridges. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 larry2@socal.rr.com _______________________________________________ see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:03:10 -0700 From: "Ron Eason" To: KR builders and pilots Subject: RE: KR>cowling Message-ID: <200308271303.AA773128520@jrl-engineering.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list Message: 2 I've used urathane glue which is like the foam but more controlable and is chemically the same material like the pourable foam. Ron ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com" Reply-To: KR builders and pilots Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:34:23 -0400 >Larry, > >The best thing to resolve your issue is to put some two part pour in place >foam on the edges and let it "weld" the blocks together. This way you end >up with a continuous foam core without gaps or hard glue joints. It works >out great because you don't need to be too careful about fit of the blocks >because the foam will expand to fill up any gaps. > >Regards, > >Bob Lee >______________________________ >N52BL KR2 Suwanee, GA 30024 >91% done only 51% to go! >Phone/Fax: 770/844-7501 >mailto:bob@flyboybob.com >http://flyboybob.com > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net >[mailto:krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net]On Behalf Of larry >severson >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:01 PM >To: KR builders and pilots >Subject: KR>cowling > > > >>I am starting on the cowling. Contouring with blocks of foam makes sense, >>but how does one join the blocks? Everything that I have tried either has >>insufficient holding power, or is too hard to sand, leaving ridges. > >Larry Severson >Fountain Valley, CA 92708 >(714) 968-9852 >larry2@socal.rr.com > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > -- Ronald R. Eason Sr. Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office J.R.L. Engineering Consortium Ltd. 816-468-4091, Kansas City, MO. Jim Eason V.P, 770-446-1291, Atlanta, Georgia Web Page: www.jrl-engineering.com -- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:03:15 -0700 From: "Ron Eason" To: KR builders and pilots Subject: RE: KR>cowling Message-ID: <200308271303.AA773194056@jrl-engineering.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list Message: 3 I've used urathane glue which is like the foam but more controlable and is chemically the same material like the pourable foam. Ron ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com" Reply-To: KR builders and pilots Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:34:23 -0400 >Larry, > >The best thing to resolve your issue is to put some two part pour in place >foam on the edges and let it "weld" the blocks together. This way you end >up with a continuous foam core without gaps or hard glue joints. It works >out great because you don't need to be too careful about fit of the blocks >because the foam will expand to fill up any gaps. > >Regards, > >Bob Lee >______________________________ >N52BL KR2 Suwanee, GA 30024 >91% done only 51% to go! >Phone/Fax: 770/844-7501 >mailto:bob@flyboybob.com >http://flyboybob.com > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net >[mailto:krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net]On Behalf Of larry >severson >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:01 PM >To: KR builders and pilots >Subject: KR>cowling > > > >>I am starting on the cowling. Contouring with blocks of foam makes sense, >>but how does one join the blocks? Everything that I have tried either has >>insufficient holding power, or is too hard to sand, leaving ridges. > >Larry Severson >Fountain Valley, CA 92708 >(714) 968-9852 >larry2@socal.rr.com > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > -- Ronald R. Eason Sr. Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office J.R.L. Engineering Consortium Ltd. 816-468-4091, Kansas City, MO. Jim Eason V.P, 770-446-1291, Atlanta, Georgia Web Page: www.jrl-engineering.com -- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:03:15 -0700 From: "Ron Eason" To: KR builders and pilots Subject: RE: KR>cowling Message-ID: <200308271303.AA51773914@jrl-engineering.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: list Message: 4 I've used urathane glue which is like the foam but more controlable and is chemically the same material like the pourable foam. Ron ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "mailbox bob at mail.flyboybob.com" Reply-To: KR builders and pilots Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:34:23 -0400 >Larry, > >The best thing to resolve your issue is to put some two part pour in place >foam on the edges and let it "weld" the blocks together. This way you end >up with a continuous foam core without gaps or hard glue joints. It works >out great because you don't need to be too careful about fit of the blocks >because the foam will expand to fill up any gaps. > >Regards, > >Bob Lee >______________________________ >N52BL KR2 Suwanee, GA 30024 >91% done only 51% to go! >Phone/Fax: 770/844-7501 >mailto:bob@flyboybob.com >http://flyboybob.com > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net >[mailto:krnet-bounces+bob=flyboybob.com@mylist.net]On Behalf Of larry >severson >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 3:01 PM >To: KR builders and pilots >Subject: KR>cowling > > > >>I am starting on the cowling. Contouring with blocks of foam makes sense, >>but how does one join the blocks? Everything that I have tried either has >>insufficient holding power, or is too hard to sand, leaving ridges. > >Larry Severson >Fountain Valley, CA 92708 >(714) 968-9852 >larry2@socal.rr.com > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > > >_______________________________________________ >see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > -- Ronald R. Eason Sr. Pres. & CEO, KCMO Office J.R.L. Engineering Consortium Ltd. 816-468-4091, Kansas City, MO. Jim Eason V.P, 770-446-1291, Atlanta, Georgia Web Page: www.jrl-engineering.com -- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:20:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Kraut To: KR builders and pilots Subject: Re: KR>cowling Message-ID: <1989285.1062015118989.JavaMail.nobody@kermit.psp.pas.earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 5 I use 3M spray adhesive. -------Original Message------- From: larry severson Sent: 08/27/03 03:01 PM To: KR builders and pilots Subject: KR>cowling > > >I am starting on the cowling. Contouring with blocks of foam makes sense, >but how does one join the blocks? Everything that I have tried either has >insufficient holding power, or is too hard to sand, leaving ridges. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 larry2@socal.rr.com _______________________________________________ see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:47:48 -0500 From: "JIM VANCE" To: "krnet" Subject: KR>Cowling Message-ID: <002d01c36d6a$f879d200$0100007f@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Message: 6 I built two cowlings. On the first one, I plied up the foam, sculpted = it to shape, and used drywall mud and varnish to finish it. I plied up = the glass and epoxy, THEN I sat down in the seat. I suddenly realized = that I would never see the runway on final and probably wouldn't see the = taxiway I was trying to go down. The second time, I made three plywood templates, one at the nose, one at = the cooling tin behind the engine, and the third one at the front end of = the tappet covers. I then filled in between with the foam. The end = result was that I knew exactly where the cowling was going to be in = relation to the engine and exhaust system, and it was low enough that I = have a possible chance of seeing where the wheels are going to hit the = ground. I paid a month's tuition to the school of hard knocks: thought I would = pass it along to perhaps save you some grief later. Jim Vance = Vance@ClaflinWildcats.comFrom AviationMech@aol.com Wed Aug 27 17:59:32 2003 Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36]) by lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19sB8N-000Cfv-00 for krnet@mylist.net; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:59:32 -0700 Received: from AviationMech@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id g.12.352365a0 (3956) for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:01:03 -0400 (EDT) From: AviationMech@aol.com Message-ID: <12.352365a0.2c7eae4f@aol.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:01:03 EDT To: krnet@mylist.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1b3 Subject: KR>Red Coach Inn X-BeenThere: krnet@mylist.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: KR builders and pilots List-Id: KR builders and pilots List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: The Inn tell me that they still have lots of our block of rooms left. Orma AKA AviationMech KR-2 N110LR 1984 to Present www.members.aol.com/aviationmech also see me at www.aviation-mechanics.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:19:39 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time) From: "Dan Heath" To: Subject: Re: KR>Cowling Message-ID: <3F4D58AB.000005.04092@Computer> References: <002d01c36d6a$f879d200$0100007f@oemcomputer> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Message: 7 Jim,=0D =0D This could be a keeper. Please tell us more about how you finished it. = How many layers of glass, did you sandwich it, how did you make the attachmen= t where it comes apart? Your start sounds great.=0D =0D I am curious though, can you see anything on landing? =0D =0D N64KR=0D =0D Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC=0D =0D DanRH@KR-Builder.org=0D =0D See you in Red Oak - 2003=0D =0D See our KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Click on the pic=0D See our EAA Chapter 242 at http://EAA242.org=0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: KR builders and pilots=0D Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:46:45 PM=0D To: krnet=0D Subject: KR>Cowling=0D =0D I built two cowlings. On the first one, I plied up the foam, sculpted it = to shape, and used drywall mud and varnish to finish it. I plied up the glas= s and epoxy, THEN I sat down in the seat. I suddenly realized that I would never see the runway on final and probably wouldn't see the taxiway I was trying to go down.=0D =0D The second time, I made three plywood templates, one at the nose, one at = the cooling tin behind the engine, and the third one at the front end of the tappet covers. I then filled in between with the foam. The end result was that I knew exactly where the cowling was going to be in relation to the engine and exhaust system, and it was low enough that I have a possible chance of seeing where the wheels are going to hit the ground.=0D =0D I paid a month's tuition to the school of hard knocks: thought I would pa= ss it along to perhaps save you some grief later.=0D =0D Jim Vance=0D Vance@ClaflinWildcat= s com_______________________________________________=0D see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html=0D =2EFrom jmw116@socal.rr.com Wed Aug 27 21:04:24 2003 Received: from orngca-mls02.socal.rr.com ([66.75.160.17]) by lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19sE1I-000GIf-00 for krnet@mylist.net; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:04:24 -0700 Received: from computer (cpe-24-24-217-209.socal.rr.com [24.24.217.209]) by orngca-mls02.socal.rr.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with SMTP id h7S41ob11024 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <002501c36d08$ea8a6450$d1d91818@computer> From: "Justin" To: "KR builders and pilots" References: <001301c36c82$67925f20$4a4d8690@oemcomputer> Subject: Re: KR>Wing Profiles Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:05:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 X-BeenThere: krnet@mylist.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: KR builders and pilots List-Id: KR builders and pilots List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: Mark, What was troys #'s before and after the mods. Isnt he running the new tail airfoil too? What engine? How about dean's plane, engine and speeds? I was speaking with Barnaby Warfan (incorrect spelling) about the new airfoil today. He did alot of articles about the KR back in the 70's and he isn't for this airfoil very much, but he also stated he didnt know much about it. FYI: His "airplane" is in the spot next to mine in our hanger. Justin N116JW www.geocities.com/attngrabber14/Home ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gavin Donohoe" To: "KR builders and pilots" Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:02 AM Subject: KR>Wing Profiles > Well Mark, I've got my plans now, and after all the to and froing about airfoils can you say conclusively which should be the best fit for the KR2S built from scratch?? > I've read about the 5048 and agree it's probably the best. How many are flying and how is the performance shaping up?? Has there been any change from the 5048 section lately to anything more suited?? > > > Gavin > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.510 / Virus Database: 307 - Release Date: 14/08/2003 > _______________________________________________ > see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:40:01 -0400 From: "Colin" To: Subject: KR>New airfoil Message-ID: <001101c36d1e$71e9f3b0$05462141@Beverly> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Message: 8 Justin, Keep in mind that the RAF 48 airfoil is not tried or proven, especially = for the KR2. There is no documentation on its performance in a wind = tunnel, just homebuilders reports. The AS5048 wing has been tested and = then used in a couple of KR2 aircraft and found to be superior in = cruise, as well as being able to bleed energy in the flair when landing. = Troy Pettiway found big improvements in all around flying = characteristics for the new wing. Troy's is one of the fastest KR's = since he has won the Copperstate a couple of times I think; that should = say enough. Unfortunately one of the things you will find in aviation = is that alot of people are against change and resist it even though all = the evidence suggests otherwise. Case in point is the success of solid = state electronics; yet the FAA will not embrace it for older points = triggered magnetos. Your friend may be well intentioned, but read the = write up on Mark's site abut the new wing and what all went into its = development and you will see why all the newly built aircraft are using = it. Colin Rainey KR2(td) crainey1@cfl.rr.com Sanford, Florida FLY SAFE!!!!From DanRH@alltel.net Thu Aug 28 02:54:44 2003 Received: from mta01.alltel.net ([166.102.165.143] helo=mta01-srv.alltel.net) by lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19sJUK-000J7R-00 for krnet@mylist.net; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:54:44 -0700 Received: from Computer ([151.213.94.185]) by mta01-srv.alltel.net with SMTP id <20030828095621.MJLT11859.mta01-srv.alltel.net@Computer> for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:56:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <3F4DD1C8.000007.04092@Computer> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 05:56:24 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail 2001 (2001155.2001155) From: "Dan Heath" References: <001101c36d1e$71e9f3b0$05462141@Beverly> X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-FVER: X-CNT: ; X-Priority: 3 To: Subject: Re: KR>New airfoil Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1b3 X-BeenThere: krnet@mylist.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: KR builders and pilots List-Id: KR builders and pilots List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: RE: Keep in mind that the RAF 48 airfoil is not tried or proven, especia= lly for the KR2.=0D =0D Colin,=0D =0D I agree with all of the points that you made, with the exception of the o= ne above. I wonder how many KR have tried and proven the RAF 48 in actual conditions. Would you guess, several thousand. I will take actual experience over lab tests anytime.=0D =0D That said, if I were to start over, given a little more actual results on the new airfoil, I would most likely go with the new one. I think that this "new breed" will probably prove it to be a very good choice.=0D =0D N64KR=0D =0D Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC=0D =0D DanRH@KR-Builder.org=0D =0D See you in Red Oak - 2003=0D =0D See our KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Click on the pic=0D See our EAA Chapter 242 at http://EAA242.org=0D =20From VANCE@claflinwildcats.com Thu Aug 28 04:22:26 2003 Received: from 63-245-139-250.kitusa.com ([63.245.139.250] helo=mail.claflinwildcats.com) by lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)id 19sKrB-000JjH-00 for krnet@mylist.net; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:22:26 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer ([]) by mail.claflinwildcats.com (Merak 5.7.4) with SMTP id EYB37074 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 06:24:00 -0500 Message-ID: <002901c36dc4$1bc94a20$0700a8c0@oemcomputer> From: "JIM VANCE" To: "krnet" Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:18:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1b3 Subject: KR>Cowling X-BeenThere: krnet@mylist.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: KR builders and pilots List-Id: KR builders and pilots List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: Dan, In answer to your question about finishing my cowling mold, I used quick = drying drywall mud, and applied it about 1/8 inch thick. I then sanded = it to final shape, ending with about 400 grit paper. I applied three = coats of varnish, letting them dry 24 hours between coats. (By the way, = the varnish will soften the drywall, so it will be streaked if you use a = bristle brush.) I found the foam brushes give a much better finish. I applied three liberal coats of alcohol based mold release (bought it = at Spruce), then plied up three plies of glass. I plied them at 60 = degree. =20 I split the top and bottom, then reattached it using aluminum piano = hinge and flathead pop rivets. I put a 1/4 inch thick layer of Lastafoam = on the inside, then one coat of KR glass. The bottom cowling is attached with piano hinges at the sides and = bottom. The rear of the top cowling connects with six Dzus fasteners. Your final question was whether I see anything on landing. Usually, I'm = so scared of landing hard that I usually have my eyes closed in the = flare. Actually, I'm about a year from flying the KR-2. See you in Red Oak. Jim Vance = Vance@ClaflinWildcats.comFrom NYPNX211@aol.com Thu Aug 28 04:45:04 2003 Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.5]) by lizard.esosoft.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 19sLD6-000JzB-00 for krnet@mylist.net; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 04:45:04 -0700 Received: from NYPNX211@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id g.18f.1ec7d9f8 (4312) for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:46:39 -0400 (EDT) From: NYPNX211@aol.com Message-ID: <18f.1ec7d9f8.2c7f459e@aol.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:46:38 EDT Subject: Re: KR>Roll Call To: krnet@mylist.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138 X-BeenThere: krnet@mylist.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b3 Precedence: list Reply-To: KR builders and pilots List-Id: KR builders and pilots List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: Old "Fly by Nite," Al Lowe, planning to be there! ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:59:08 -0400 From: To: krnet@mylist.net Subject: KR>Roll Call Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: list Message: 9 Sounds like a lot of KR people are going. I wont know if I am going until the last minute. I have 9 houses under construction and the developer I work for purchased 37 more lots. If I can get away I will be traveling up interstate 65 from Auburn Alabama during the evening (thursday night) If someone on the route is undecisive as I am and waits till the last minute let me know. I could pick you up. Steven Phillabaum skphil@charter.net Auburn, Alabama ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:52:13 -0400 From: "William Clapp" To: "KR builders and pilots" Subject: Re: KR>RED OAK - GATHERING Message-ID: <00d201c36d6c$141c4b40$2cfcd241@clapp> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20030826125011.02860dd0@pop-server.socal.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list Message: 10 If anybody is driving from the East coast - Florida/georgia/AL area and want a rider/driver to accompany - let me know. Its a long haul from here and two or three make a long trip much faster and more pleasent. Thanks - Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: larry severson To: KR builders and pilots Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:51 PM Subject: Re: KR>RED OAK - GATHERING ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:02:30 -0400 From: "William Clapp" To: "KR builders and pilots" Subject: KR>Tach Message-ID: <010f01c36d6d$06674580$2cfcd241@clapp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Message: 11 Am looking to purchase an electric 2 1/4 tach for my corvair. Ive heard = that an electric tach could cause the points to fail if the tach fails. = Is this so? Is there a better alternative or since I will be running = two points can I run one for the tach and one as my backup? Ideas? = Bill ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html End of KRnet Digest, Vol 141, Issue 1 *************************************