From: krnet-bounces@mylist.net To: John Bouyea Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 347, Issue 248 Date: 6/24/2005 9:00:14 PM Send KRnet mailing list submissions to krnet@mylist.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to krnet-request@mylist.net You can reach the person managing the list at krnet-owner@mylist.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..." Today's Topics: 1. take off distance and time to take off (phil brookman) 2. Re: take off distance and time to take off (phil brookman) 3. RE: motivation (Tommy) 4. Re: KR2 or 2S project (Joseph H. Horton) 5. Re: Having a washer under the head (Donald Reid) 6. Re: Having a washer under the head (Joseph H. Horton) 7. Re: Re: inspection (ken j grevemberg) 8. Having a washer under the head (larry flesner) 9. antenna question (Oscar Zuniga) 10. Re: Having a washer under the head (Joseph H. Horton) 11. Re: Re: inspection (Joseph H. Horton) 12. R?f. : KR> Having a washer under the head (Serge VIDAL) 13. Re: R?f. : KR> Having a washer under the head (patrusso) 14. Antenna Questions (JIM VANCE) 15. cont.o200 for trade (jim mcdonaugh) 16. Re: Re: inspection (larry severson) 17. Re: Prop for sale... (Carol & Weldon Jennings) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:10:25 +0100 From: "phil brookman" Subject: KR> take off distance and time to take off To: "KRnet" Message-ID: <004501c578a4$f0ee83e0$73a51352@philljl2re6t9i> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" realy interested in knowing your t/o distances and prop/engine combinations be good to archive the info a video on the net seems to give about 11 secs before airborn wil be doing some static thrust checks soon with different props so should be interesting phil -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.10/25 - Release Date: 21/06/2005 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:13:09 +0100 From: "phil brookman" Subject: Re: KR> take off distance and time to take off To: "KRnet" Message-ID: <005e01c578ad$b4032ef0$73a51352@philljl2re6t9i> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 and also be interested your take off times from opening throttle to airborn p ----- Original Message ----- From: "phil brookman" To: "KRnet" Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 11:10 AM Subject: KR> take off distance and time to take off realy interested in knowing your t/o distances and prop/engine combinations be good to archive the info a video on the net seems to give about 11 secs before airborn wil be doing some static thrust checks soon with different props so should be interesting phil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.10/25 - Release Date: 21/06/2005 -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 20839 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now! -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.7.10/25 - Release Date: 21/06/2005 ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:18:11 -0400 From: "Tommy" Subject: RE: KR> motivation To: "'KRnet'" Message-ID: <001f01c578b6$cac0a150$6501a8c0@TOMMY> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Fantastic! -----Original Message----- From: krnet-bounces@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-bounces@mylist.net] On Behalf Of larry flesner Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:14 PM To: KRnet Subject: KR> motivation Netters, Last Sunday (Fathers day here in the U.S.) I made a 60 mile flight in the KR to the grass strip home of a local EAA chapter for their monthly meeting. Puffy clouds at 5000 made for a smooth, cool ride down at 6500. Still inspired by the flight on Monday morning I sat down and wrote the following poem. I thought of saving it for the awards banquet at the Gathering but realized that many of you won't be there and you too may find it motivating and inspire you to get back out to the workshop and make more sanding dust. And for those already flying, I'd hope you take a fresh look at all the sights you get to see on your next flight. Enjoy........... Larry Flesner ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ KR Flight I'm setting high on lofty perch, such grandeur do I see This view above the earth and clouds suspends reality The rivers twist and turn their way through fields of green and brown And I can see the paths they take that leads from town to town The patchwork patterns made by man are such an awesome thing In disbelief I watch the wonders slip beneath my wing His efforts show in every field with patterns seldom seen Each season brings a painting new on pallets fresh and clean I swoop and soar about the clouds each one unique and new My senses seem inadequate to take in all I view Is all I see the evidence of God in realms unknown Or could the world I'm seeing now evolve all on it's own All too soon the time slips by, this dream-state soon will end My only hope -"God bless these wings that I might fly again" C Larry Flesner, June20, 2005 Carterville, Illinois _______________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:13:11 -0400 From: "Joseph H. Horton" Subject: Re: KR> KR2 or 2S project To: krnet@mylist.net Message-ID: <20050624.081953.2060.8.joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Bill, How is Glenda's project coming along?? We haven't heard from her in a while. Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:16:09 EDT IFLYKRS@aol.com writes: > Where are you located? I have a couple KR projects we are working on > here > in Valdosta Ga. If interested in seeing talking let me know. > Bill Clapp > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:48:00 -0400 From: Donald Reid Subject: Re: KR> Having a washer under the head To: KRnet Message-ID: <6.1.0.6.2.20050624084139.01b97300@mail.peoplepc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 01:21 PM 6/23/2005, you wrote: > At LEAST one thick washer, and as >many as needed to allow visual inspection to confirm that the nut is >torqued properly, not bottomed out on the threads. > >SEE AC43-13-1B, Section 7-37, which says maximum 1/8 inch of washers, >but no reason stated. The reason should be fairly obvious. AN bolts come in 1/8" graduations of length. If you need 1/8" (or more) of washers, then you can use the next shorter bolt. With a standard AN lock or castle nut, if no more than three threads are showing above the top of the nut, then the bolt has not bottomed out. Proper thread engagement is ensured if one thread is showing. That differential is approximately the thickness of an AN washer. Don Reid - donreid "at" peoplepc.com Bumpass, Va Visit my web sites at: AeroFoil, a 2-D Airfoil Design And Analysis Computer Program: http://aerofoilengineering.com KR2XL construction: http://aerofoilengineering.com/KR/KR2XL.htm Aviation Surplus: http://aerofoilengineering.com/PartsListing/Airparts.htm EAA Chapter 231: http://eaa231.org Ultralights: http://usua250.org VA EAA State Fly-in: http://vaeaa.org ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:19:58 -0400 From: "Joseph H. Horton" Subject: Re: KR> Having a washer under the head To: krnet@mylist.net Message-ID: <20050624.091959.2060.10.joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii OK- that makes sense to me , but what about this situation that I think every KR builder has run into. At the aileron control linkage to the aileron control horn to get full travel with out binding I found that I need a washer between the control horn and the rodend bearing and then to be able to have a large washer on the outside of the rodend bearing It needed 2 more small washers first so the rodend does not bind on the large washer. In other words here is the order-- bolt head,washer, control horn, 2 washers, Large washer, castle nut with cotter pin. That puts a total of 4 washers in this system. I could replace the 2 washers with a aluminum spacer but that dose not seem practical to me. I know others have had to do something at these points to get the geometry to work. I just don't want to be rebuilding in front of an inspector Thanks Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Donald Reid writes: > At 01:21 PM 6/23/2005, you wrote: > > At LEAST one thick washer, and as > >many as needed to allow visual inspection to confirm that the nut > is > >torqued properly, not bottomed out on the threads. > > > >SEE AC43-13-1B, Section 7-37, which says maximum 1/8 inch of > washers, > >but no reason stated. > > The reason should be fairly obvious. AN bolts come in 1/8" > graduations of > length. If you need 1/8" (or more) of washers, then you can use the > next > shorter bolt. With a standard AN lock or castle nut, if no more > than three > threads are showing above the top of the nut, then the bolt has not > > bottomed out. Proper thread engagement is ensured if one thread is > > showing. That differential is approximately the thickness of an AN > washer. > > > > Don Reid - donreid "at" peoplepc.com > Bumpass, Va > > Visit my web sites at: > > AeroFoil, a 2-D Airfoil Design And Analysis Computer Program: > http://aerofoilengineering.com > > KR2XL construction: http://aerofoilengineering.com/KR/KR2XL.htm > Aviation Surplus: > http://aerofoilengineering.com/PartsListing/Airparts.htm > EAA Chapter 231: http://eaa231.org > Ultralights: http://usua250.org > VA EAA State Fly-in: http://vaeaa.org > > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:46:40 -0400 From: ken j grevemberg Subject: Re: KR> Re: inspection To: krnet@mylist.net Message-ID: <20050624.104640.512.0.kgrevemberg@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Joe, I am building a KR2 and have never dealt with the paperwork. Any suggestions/help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ken Grevemberg 304 Whitewater Lake Road Yamassee, SC 29686 864-944-5722 On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:30:00 -0400 Joseph H Horton writes: > Guy's > Just got done talking to the man that is planning on inspecting my > plane > next week. To start off with he said that I had the best and most > complete paper package he had ever received. So far so good . Thanks > to > Dan H. and anyone else that I plagiarized information from. > That being said he has concern about the aerocarb. So I'll see how > that > runs when he is here. Let the count down begin! > > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, Pa. > joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:09:17 -0500 From: larry flesner Subject: KR> Having a washer under the head To: KRnet Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20050624100917.00854480@pop.midwest.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In other words here is the order-- bolt head,washer, >control horn, 2 washers, Large washer, castle nut with cotter pin. That >puts a total of 4 washers in this system. I could replace the 2 washers >with a aluminum spacer but that dose not seem practical to me. I know >others have had to do something at these points to get the geometry to >work. I just don't want to be rebuilding in front of an inspector Joe >Horton ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In my humble opinion, when circumstances dictate, let common sense prevail. I used a thick wall nylon spacer between my aileron horn and the rodend bearing on the aileron pushrod to get the correct geometry. The forces at that point are not great but you MUST have a system that has zero slop or endplay to eliminate the posibility of flutter and control sloppiness. Check for correct maximum deflection, and eliminate any binding or slop. The accepted procedure for bolt alignment on aircraft is head up or to the front of the aircraft but there are times when that's not possible and a bolt is inserted from the bottom or rear. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. If your inspector gives you any hassle on that point, and I doubt that he/she will, make them give you their opinion on exactly how it should be done to be acceptable. Don't let them get by with " well I'm not sure but you'll have to change it". I really don't think you have anything to worry about. Larry Flesner ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:39:51 -0500 From: "Oscar Zuniga" Subject: KR> antenna question To: krnet@mylist.net, pietenpol-list@matronics.com Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Okay, in a nutshell I'm wondering if two antennas can share the same ground plane. Wait! I know they can't if they're both on the same side of it, but imagine this. Wood frame/fabric covering (Pietenpol) or composite construction (KR), essentially "transparent" to RF signals, with an 18" square aluminum sheet ground plane mounted behind the pilot's seat, with the VHF COM antenna mounted to the top of the sheet inside the tailcone. Then, the ELT whip mounted to the underside of the same aluminum sheet, sticking out the bottom of the airplane. I realize that it isn't practical to do that on a KR due to ground clearance, but I'm talking about "in theory". Can they share the ground plane if they're on opposite sides of it. Mounting two antennas too close to one another isn't good for either one, but if they can't "see" each other through the ground plane? Thanks... Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:45:46 -0400 From: "Joseph H. Horton" Subject: Re: KR> Having a washer under the head To: krnet@mylist.net Message-ID: <20050624.124859.2060.12.joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Larry- I'm going to leave it as is. Joe > > In my humble opinion, when circumstances dictate, let common sense > prevail. I used a thick wall nylon spacer between my aileron horn and > the rodend bearing on the aileron pushrod to get the correct > geometry. > > The forces at that point are not great but you MUST have a system > that > has zero slop or endplay to eliminate the posibility of flutter and > > control sloppiness. Check for correct maximum deflection, and > eliminate any binding or slop. > > The accepted procedure for bolt alignment on aircraft is head up or to > the front of the aircraft but there are times when that's not possible > and a bolt is inserted from the bottom or rear. Sometimes you > gotta > do what you gotta do. > > If your inspector gives you any hassle on that point, and I doubt > that > he/she will, make them give you their opinion on exactly how it > should be done to be acceptable. Don't let them get by with " well > I'm not sure but you'll have to change it". I really don't think > you > have anything to worry about. > > Larry Flesner > > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:46:34 -0400 From: "Joseph H. Horton" Subject: Re: KR> Re: inspection To: krnet@mylist.net Message-ID: <20050624.124859.2060.13.joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ken and all, The first step as I know now is to contact the MIDO. Mine was very helpful and supportive. They sent a package with all the documents and instructions to fill them out. ( I think that Larry had them available at the last gathering also) I found the inspector that I was going to use next, Inn my case that happens to be a AB-DAR, but it could be from MIDO,FSDO, or the EAA program of inspect for cash. He sent me a small package of his requests for information. I combined both lists along with any other official papers that I had already done (registration documents in my case) Sent 1 complete copy to the MIDO for review (mailed, reviewed, and back in my mail box in 3 calender days-this guy is going to give the FAA a good name) I sent 2 complete copies to the inspector. We reviewed this over the phone and I then copied him on the MIDO comments to the package. I also re contacted the FSDO during this as there is a little confusion on who has the finial say for test area. During these conversations I found out that I was talking to the inspector that would be reviewing the recommendation for the repairmans certificate. That document is included in the original package from the MIDO. You will want to make sure that it gets completed after the inspection is complete but before your inspector leaves. My inspection will proably be Wednesday or Thursday this week. Having had all this paper work in their hands before they ever get there I am certain will cut way down on the time it takes and the ensuing anxiety. I know for sure that the inspection that I will go through is going to be very tough.( not like the sugar pill that one of our friends got last year). But I am not afraid of that, I'm confident that I have done a responsible job of at very least adequate quality. I would rather have the hard inspection and save my life then to have someone look around and say I'll be fine. Bring on the inspector. (The Yeee -- Haaa is building) Good Luck Joe Horton, Coopersburg, PA. joe.kr2s.builder@juno.com On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:46:40 -0400 ken j grevemberg writes: > Joe, > I am building a KR2 and have never dealt with the paperwork. Any > suggestions/help will be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Ken Grevemberg > 304 Whitewater Lake Road > Yamassee, SC 29686 > 864-944-5722 > > ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:51:49 +0200 From: Serge VIDAL Subject: R?f. : KR> Having a washer under the head To: KRnet Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" During an annual, my inpector insisted that I put a LARGE washer at the end of the stack that you describe. His idea was that should the bearing fail (ball separating from the body), the rod end should not be able to get around the nut and separate from the horn. For the rest, I plan to make aluminium spacers, rather than washers, but that's just for aesthetics. Serge Vidal KR2 "Kilimanjaro Cloud" Paris, France larry flesner Envoyé par : krnet-bounces+serge.vidal=sagem.com@mylist.net 2005-06-24 17:09 Veuillez répondre à KRnet Remis le : 2005-06-24 17:13 Pour : KRnet cc : (ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM) Objet : KR> Having a washer under the head In other words here is the order-- bolt head,washer, >control horn, 2 washers, Large washer, castle nut with cotter pin. That >puts a total of 4 washers in this system. I could replace the 2 washers >with a aluminum spacer but that dose not seem practical to me. I know >others have had to do something at these points to get the geometry to >work. I just don't want to be rebuilding in front of an inspector Joe >Horton ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In my humble opinion, when circumstances dictate, let common sense prevail. I used a thick wall nylon spacer between my aileron horn and the rodend bearing on the aileron pushrod to get the correct geometry. The forces at that point are not great but you MUST have a system that has zero slop or endplay to eliminate the posibility of flutter and control sloppiness. Check for correct maximum deflection, and eliminate any binding or slop. The accepted procedure for bolt alignment on aircraft is head up or to the front of the aircraft but there are times when that's not possible and a bolt is inserted from the bottom or rear. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. If your inspector gives you any hassle on that point, and I doubt that he/she will, make them give you their opinion on exactly how it should be done to be acceptable. Don't let them get by with " well I'm not sure but you'll have to change it". I really don't think you have anything to worry about. Larry Flesner _______________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:29:55 -0400 From: "patrusso" Subject: Re: R?f. : KR> Having a washer under the head To: "KRnet" Message-ID: <001d01c578e2$56eaaf10$74a772d8@patrusso> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Serge Had'nt thought of that one. I think it's a good idea Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Serge VIDAL" To: "KRnet" Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 12:51 PM Subject: Réf. : KR> Having a washer under the head > During an annual, my inpector insisted that I put a LARGE washer at > the end of the stack that you describe. His idea was that should the > bearing fail (ball separating from the body), the rod end should not > be able to get around the nut and separate from the horn. > > For the rest, I plan to make aluminium spacers, rather than washers, > but that's just for aesthetics. > > Serge Vidal > KR2 "Kilimanjaro Cloud" > Paris, France > > > > > > > larry flesner > > Envoyé par : krnet-bounces+serge.vidal=sagem.com@mylist.net > 2005-06-24 17:09 > Veuillez répondre à KRnet > Remis le : 2005-06-24 17:13 > > > Pour : KRnet > cc : (ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM) > Objet : KR> Having a washer under the head > > > > In other words here is the order-- bolt head,washer, >>control horn, 2 washers, Large washer, castle nut with cotter pin. >>That puts a total of 4 washers in this system. I could replace the 2 >>washers with a aluminum spacer but that dose not seem practical to me. >>I know others have had to do something at these points to get the >>geometry to work. I just don't want to be rebuilding in front of an >>inspector Joe Horton > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > In my humble opinion, when circumstances dictate, let common sense > prevail. I used a thick wall nylon spacer between my aileron horn and > the rodend bearing on the aileron pushrod to get the correct geometry. > > The forces at that point are not great but you MUST have a system that > has zero slop or endplay to eliminate the posibility of flutter and > control sloppiness. Check for correct maximum deflection, and > eliminate any binding or slop. > > The accepted procedure for bolt alignment on aircraft is head up or to > the front of the aircraft but there are times when that's not possible > and a bolt is inserted from the bottom or rear. Sometimes you gotta > do what you gotta do. > > If your inspector gives you any hassle on that point, and I doubt that > he/she will, make them give you their opinion on exactly how it > should be done to be acceptable. Don't let them get by with " well > I'm not sure but you'll have to change it". I really don't think you > have anything to worry about. > > Larry Flesner > > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:10:02 -0500 From: "JIM VANCE" Subject: KR> Antenna Questions To: "krnet" Message-ID: <002a01c578e8$ed9d9340$0200a8c0@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Oscar, You can use the same groundplane, but you should reverse the antennas. The ELT signal will be picked up be satellites, so it should be on top. The VHF comm signal is going to ground stations, so it should be below. This means that you definitely will not be able to hear anything on VHF when the ELT is triggered. Is it possible to extend the aluminum base plate with wires, foil tapes, or some other conducting material? The ground plane should have a RADIUS about 5% bigger than heighth of the driven element. That means that it should be about 54 inches in diameter. If you can get four wires or rods about 90 degrees apart that are 54 inches from tip to the opposite tip, you will greatly enhance your signals. I have used 3/32" brazing rod with great success. If you don't need the rigidity, then aircraft or house electrical wire would be fine. Jim Vance Vance@ClaflinWildcats.com ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:12:09 -0400 From: "jim mcdonaugh" Subject: KR> cont.o200 for trade To: "KRnet" Message-ID: <001201c578f0$9f17fa00$9865fea9@siliconswamp1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" i have a cont o200 for trade it is dissassembled for checking came off c150 to upgrade to 150hp minus one mag and generator also incluts cooling tin for a c150.it is just too heavy for my teenie two.it had less then 1100 hrs smoh.i need a 2180 vw engine for my plane.lets barter. jim mcdonaug@bellsouth.net ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:22:27 -0700 From: larry severson Subject: Re: KR> Re: inspection To: KRnet Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.0.20050624172010.00c2d420@pop-server.socal.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 10:46 AM 6/24/2005 -0400, you wrote: >Joe, > I am building a KR2 and have never dealt with the paperwork. Any >suggestions/help will be greatly appreciated. There is a program called Kitlog. It helps you track all of the building progress, as required, and then fills out the required paperwork giving you the complete requried submittal package. I received a trial package through the EAA, and am very impressed. Larry Severson Fountain Valley, CA 92708 (714) 968-9852 larry2@socal.rr.com ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:51:03 -0700 From: "Carol & Weldon Jennings" Subject: Re: KR> Prop for sale... To: "KRnet" Message-ID: <001101c57939$1cb778d0$1d1ffea9@Duke> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original I'm interested in your Ptince 52x54 with spinner. Can you elaborate a little on it? (I'm a new KR project owner and new to the KRnet folks). Please email me at Tonka@spsdialup.com. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:53 PM Subject: KR> Prop for sale... > If anybody is interested in a prop, I have two for sale at this time. > Bother are drilled for VW or SAE1 pattern and have been test flown. > They are #1 a > Prince P-tip (gery style) 52X50 for $400.00 and #2 a Prince P-tip > (grey) > with a 52 X 54 with composite spinner for $550.00. They both work > well. > I can > sell the smaller one and if you need the larger I will swap you out. Let > me know on the net if interested. > > I also have a Langfor cowl (suggest you modify) if anybody wants > to > buy > one. > > Please let me know. > > Bill > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html End of KRnet Digest, Vol 347, Issue 248 *************************************** ================================== ABC Amber Outlook Converter v4.20 Trial version ==================================